The Place of Identity Dissonance and Emotional Motivations in Bio-Cultural Models of Religious Experience: A Report from the 19th Century
Keywords:
bio-cultural model, identity, nineteenth century, voices and visions, emotional motivationsAbstract
Durham University’s ‘Hearing the Voice’ project involves a multi-disciplinary exploration of hallucinatory-type phenomena in an attempt to revaluate and reframe discussions of these experiences. As part of this project, contemporaneous religious experiences (supernatural voices and visions) in the United States from the first half of the nineteenth century have been analysed, shedding light on the value and applicability of contemporary bio-cultural models of religious experience for such historical cases. In particular, this essay outlines four historical cases, seeking to utilise and to refine four theoretical models, including anthropologist Tanya Luhrmann’s ‘absorption hypothesis’, by returning to something like William James’ concern with ‘discordant personalities’. Ultimately, the paper argues that emphasis on the role of identity dissonance must not be omitted from the analytical tools applied to these nineteenth-century examples, and perhaps should be retained for any study of religious experience generally.
References
Bushman, R. 2005. Joseph Smith: Rough Stone Rolling. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
Davies, D. 2000. The Mormon Culture of Salvation. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Davies, D. 2010. Joseph Smith, Jesus, and satanic Opposition. Farnham: Ashgate.
Davies, D. 2011. Emotion, Identity, and Religion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Festinger, L., Riecken, H., and Schachter, S. 1956. When Prophecy Fails. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Geertz, A. 2010. Brain, Body, and Culture: A Biocultural Theory of Religion. Method and Theory in the Study of Religion. 22: 304-321.
Gilbert, O. 1850. Narrative of Sojourner Truth. Boston: Self-published.
Gray, T. 1831. The Confessions of Nat Turner. Baltimore: Lucas & Deaver Printers.
Greenfield, S. 2011. You and Me: The Neuroscience of Identity. London: Notting Hill Editions.
Harris, S., Kaplan, J., Curiel, A., Bookheimer, S., Iacoboni, M., and Cohen, M. 2009. The Neural Correlates of Religious and Nonreligious Beliefs. PLoS ONE, 4(10): e0007272. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0007272.
James, W. 2004 [1902]. The Varieties of Religious Experience. New York: Banres & Noble Books.
Jessee, D., Ashurst-McGee, M., and Jensen, R. (eds). 2008. The Joseph Smith Papers, Journals, Volume 1. Salt Lake City: The Church Historian’s Press.
Kanai, R., Feilden, T., Firth, C., and Rees, G. 2011. Political Orientations are Correlated with Brain structure in Young Adults. Current Biology, 21: 677-680.
Kaplan, J., Gimbel, S., and Harris, S. 2016. Neural Correlates of Maintaining One’s Political Beliefs in the Face of Counterevidence. Scientific Reports, 6: 39589. DOI: 10.1038/srep39589.
Luhrmann, T., Nusbaum, H., and Thisted, R. 2010. The Absorption Hypothesis: Learning to Hear God in Evangelical Christianity. American Anthropologist, 112(1): 66-78.
Luhrmann, T. 2012. When God Talks Back. New York: Vintage Books.
Luhrmann, T., Nusbaum, H., and Thisted, R. 2013. “Lord, Teach Us to Prayâ€: Prayer Practice Affects Cognitive processing. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 13: 159-177.
Mol, H. 1976. Identity and the Sacred. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Morain, W. 1998. The Sword of Laban: Joseph Smith, Jr. and the Dissociated Mind. London: American Psychiatric Press.
Taves, A. 2009. Religious Experience Reconsidered. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Taves, A. 2016. Revelatory Events. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Taves, A. 2017. Experience as event: event cognition and the study of (religious) experiences. Religion, Brain and Behavior, 7(1): 43-62.
White, E. 1922 [1851]. Christian Experience and Teachings of Ellen G. White. Silver Spring: Ellen White Estate, Inc.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
The Journal for the Study of Religious Experience is a peer-reviewed, open-access journal. All journal content, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The copyright for articles published in this journal is retained by the authors and the Journal for the Study of Religious Experience. Â Authors would need to request the reuse of the article in case they want to publish it elsewhere and they should acknowledge the initial publication in JSRE.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) a link to the Journal’s website where the article may be downloaded for free.
Authors are responsible for ensuring copyright clearance for any images, tables, etc. which are supplied from an outside source.
Â