Introduction. Fieldwork in Religion: Bodily Experience and Ethnographic Knowledge
This Introduction presents the main arguments debated in this Special Issue upon the construction of ethnographic knowledge in researching among participants of religious and spiritual groups through the lenses of bodily experience, addressing the empirical, ethical, epistemological, relational, political and analytical implications of this significant aspect of fieldwork. We ask specifically how does the ethnographer's experience of researching among these groups inform the production of ethnographic knowledge? In which way does it redefine our analytical categories, and the way we approach the experiences of participants in these groups? Up to which extent do our interlocutors expects us to know about their experiences and practices? When it comes to religious and spiritual experience these questions seem to enter an insidious territory challenging established categories, such as â€˜knowledgeâ€™ and â€˜beliefâ€™, â€˜bodyâ€™, â€˜selfâ€™ and â€˜personhoodâ€™, â€˜healthâ€™ and â€˜illnessâ€™; categories which we argue that should arise from the felt immediacy of the field. Eventually we address ethnography as a dispositive that throughout the research process not only involves the â€˜intellectualâ€™ activity of the scholar, but also the researcher as person and agent whose theoretical task should also include the empirical research on his/her experience of knowing and becoming in the field, considering the flow of relationships established with those â€˜othersâ€™ in many ways who participate in the â€˜project of knowingâ€™ and constitute the raison d'Ãªtre of ethnographic research.
Carvalho, J. J. 1993. Antropologia: Saber AcadÃªmico e ExperiÃªncia IniciÃ¡tica. AnuÃ¡rio AntropolÃ³gico, 90: 91-107.
Deleuze, G. and Guattari, F. 1980. Mille Plateaux. Paris: Minuit.
Favret-Saada, J. 1980. Deadly Words: Witchcraft in the Bocage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
â€”. 1990. About Participation. Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry, 14: 189-99.
Foucault, M. 1979. The History of Sexuality, Volume 1: An Introduction. London: Allen Lane.
Geertz, C. 1988. Works and Lives: The Anthropologist as Author. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Goldman, M. 2003. Os Tambores dos Mortos e os Tambores dos Vivos: Etnografia, Antropologia e PolÃtica em IlÃ©us, Bahia. Revista de Antropologia, 46(2): 445-476.
Goulet, J. G. and B. Granville Miller. eds. 2007. Extraordinary Anthropology: Transformations in the Field. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
Ingold, T. 2006. Anthropology is Not Ethnography. Proceedings of the British Academy, 154: 69-92.
Segato, R. L. 1992. . Um Paradoxo do Relativismo: Discurso Racional da Antropologia frente ao Sagrado. ReligiÃ£o e Sociedade, 16(1): 114-133.
Young, D. E. & J. G. Goulet. eds. 1994. Being Changed by Cross-Cultural Encounters; The Anthropology of Extraordinary Experience. Peterborough & New York: Broadview Press.
The Journal for the Study of Religious Experience is a peer-reviewed, open-access journal. All journal content, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under theÂ Creative CommonsÂ Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 InternationalÂ License.
The copyright for articles published in this journal is retained by the authors and the Journal for the Study of Religious Experience. Â Authors would need to request the reuse of the article in case they want to publish it elsewhere and they should acknowledge the initial publication in JSRE.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) a link to the Journalâ€™s website where the article may be downloaded for free.
Authors are responsible for ensuring copyright clearance for any images, tables, etc. which are supplied from an outside source.